Read more

Subscribe now

In Episode 6 of INCITE-FUEL, your fave hosts, J.D. Hall and JSlayUSA, kick things off by examining the recent claims of Jewish supremacy by an Israeli Knesset member and the kosher “conservative” media’s sudden embrace of mass surveillance and data centers. Because at this point, even the average die-ha…

Read more

Ground Zero New York developer Larry Silverstein — Chairman of Silverstein Properties, a real estate development and investment company headquartered in Manhattan. The company has owned and managed office, hotel, and commercial projects totaling more than 32,000 square meters. The company is currently developing properties valued at approximately $8 billion.

In July 2001, Larry Silverstein completed the largest real estate transaction in the United States when he signed a 99-year lease for the World Trade Center (the Twin Towers). All of this took place two months before the terrorist attack on the Twin Towers.

Today, he is engaged in the construction of the new office complex at Ground Zero, a project estimated at approximately $20 billion and considered the work of his lifetime.

Mr. Silverstein devotes his time and resources to organizations promoting education, medical research, humanitarian needs, and support for the arts. Mr. Silverstein served as chairman of the board of the UJA Foundation. He is one of the founders of the Museum of Jewish Heritage in New York and also served as treasurer of the Jewish medical center in Denver, Colorado.

Today, Mr. Silverstein serves as a board member of the New York Philharmonic Orchestra. He is an enthusiastic lover of classical music, an experienced yacht sailor, and a proud resident of New York City.

Clara and Larry Silverstein have been married for 58 years and are the parents of three children, some of whom work at Silverstein Properties.

Real Estate City Eilat 2014 — Israel Construction Center // Main Plenary Event

Subscribe now

This is the FIRST article of a three-part series covering these topics (clickable):

1. The Jesuit Priest Who Pretended to be a Rabbi

2. John Nelson Darby: The Mysterious Father of Dispensationalism

3. Cyrus Scofield: Scoundrel and Scholar (most recent)

A TIMELINE FOR HISTORIC CONTEXT

These threads of history set the stage for Manuel Lacunza’s life and motivations.

1400’s & 1500’s —The Crypto-Jews

Even before the Spanish Inquisition of 1478, the Catholic Church was forcing non-Catholics among several European nations to adopt Catholicism or face expulsion. As a result, Crypto-Judaism begins to emerge. A Crypto-Jew or “converso” secretly adhered to Judaism while publicly professing Catholicism. These were often Kabbalistic Jews who professed Christ with their tongues, while secretly maintaining their Jewish identity. Many of them harbored deep resentment and a desire for revenge.

Early 1500s – the Protestant Reformation

Martin Luther, William Tyndale, and others spearhead the protestant reformation. The movement grows like wildfire, causing the Roman Catholic Church to hemorrhage power and influence in Europe. Due to the reformer’s belief that,“the papacy is the seat of the true and real Antichrist”, they quicky become enemy number one of the “Mother Church”. The Vatican scrambles to get back on the offensive.

1534 - 1540: The Formation of the Jesuit Order

The Spaniard, Ignatius of Loyola meets with six other men in a crypt beneath the church of Saint-Denis, pronouncing vows of poverty and obedience to the Catholic Church. They called themselves the Society of Jesus, which soon becomes known as the Jesuit Order after Pope John Paul III permits them to become ordained priests. Loyola was an ardent admirer of the Jews, and out of the seven original members of this group, at least four belonged to crypto Jewish families, possibly including Loyola himself as the fifth. *Modern-day Jesuit leadership maintains that the Order was never Crypto-Jewish, and that conversos stopped joining them in 1593.

1545 – The Counter-Reformation and the Council of Trent

The Jesuits are commissioned by the pope to destroy Protestantism and bring the people back to the mother Church. However, the violent inquisition employed by the Catholic church backfires, only convincing more protestants that Papal Rome and the Vatican were the “Beast” of Revelation, the antichrist system.

1550 to 1700: The Jesuit Deception

In the background of the inquisition, a few exceptionally intelligent Jesuit priests are hard at work developing new interpretations of scripture that would counteract the protestant’s application of the “antichrist” to the Pope. These Jesuit priests included Francisco Ribera, Robert Bellarmine, and Manuel Lacunza, who built upon each other’s work. These men are largely responsible for the modern Christian doctrines of “futurism”, including Zionism, and with Lacunza in particular, a two phased return of Christ.

1790: Manuel Lacunza Completes His Magnum Opus

The Chilean Jesuit, Manuel Lacunza completes his most well-known work, “The Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty”, writing under the pseudonym of “Rabbi Juan Josaphat Ben-Ezra – A Converted Jew”. “Lacunza” is a Sephardic Jewish name documented among the Jewish converso families of Chile, which sheds light on his teachings of a Jewish return to Palestine including a rebuilt temple and animal sacrifices. Lacunza’s manuscript is the first fully formed, well rounded view of pre-millennial dispensationalism and its core components. While the Spanish courts did not allow it to be published, it was secretly published in Spanish by a few powerful Catholics, such as Argentine General Manuel Belgrano in 1816.

Manuel Lacunza’s Re-Interpretation of Prophecy

In 1812, a book was published in Spain that would eventually affect the interpretation of scripture by millions and millions of Christians from the 19th century through today, though most have no idea this book even exists. The book is called “THE COMING OF MESSIAH IN GLORY AND MAJESTY” by Juan Josafat Ben-Ezra, a Converted Jew.

The deception begins right there, with the author and his title. The book was actually penned by the Catholic Jesuit priest, Manuel Lacunza. Throughout the book, he refers to himself as a Jewish rabbi and refers to the Jews and Hebrews as, “my people”. If you read his book, you will see that Lacunza was an exceptionally intelligent man, and there was an important strategy in this.

A primary objective of the early Jesuit order was to counter the Protestant reformation, which had been stealing away the political and religious influence of the Vatican. So, from the 1500’s through the 1800’s, Lacunza and other Jesuits before him were writing books to counteract the reformers’ influence, and especially their interpretation of the Book of Revelation. The reformers believed that Christ’s second coming was imminent, and that the Pope system and the Roman Catholic Church were likely the “Antichrist system” and the “whore of Babylon” respectively. See the footnotes for an amazing list of quotes from well known reformers who believed this. From this fact alone it’s obvious that a pre-tribulation rapture was not on the table for the reformers, because they believed the Antichrist was among them. This being the case, it would be impossible for the writings of a Catholic Priest (especially a Jesuit) to be able to penetrate and derail the protestant reformer’s theology if his identity was known. Side note: The previous Pope Francis was the very first Jesuit Pope.

What Lacunza accomplished with his book was to reinterpret several key verses in the Bible that eventually altered Christian end times doctrines in a major way. This can be proven by what well known Biblical commentaries say about these key verses before and then after Lacunza’s book. Here a a couple of examples:

Daniel Chapter 9:26-27 provides one such example:

²⁶ And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. ²⁷And HE shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Bible commentaries written prior to Lacunza’s book including those by John Wesley, Matthew Henry, Adam Clarke and Albert Barnes all agree that the “HE” in verse 27 is “the Messiah” Jesus who destroyed the sanctuary and its customs, as a result of his sacrifice and atonement. These authors believed that this entire prophecy was fulfilled during the first century with the destruction of the Temple.

However when Lacunza covers Daniel 9:26-27, he inserts a reference to the “Antichrist who will rebuild the Jewish temple and its city”. This is the first commentary that mentions an antichrist and a future rebuilding of the temple in reference to these specific verses. Jumping way ahead for a moment, the future Scofield reference Bible (which influenced nearly every Bible College in America), takes this commentary even further, stating that the “one-week” as shown in verse 27 is referring to a week of 7 years where the Antichrist reigns during the tribulation.

Here is another important example from some key verses from Romans 9 and 11. These verses demonstrate how ethnic Israel was cut off from the tree due to unbelief, and establishes the only way they can be grafted back in:

^{Romans 9:6} Not as though the word of God, hath taken no effect, for they are not all Israel, which are of Israel.

^{Romans 9:8} They, which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.

^{Romans 9:11} Even so then at this present time, also there is a remnant, according to the election of grace.

^{Romans 11:20} Because of unbelief, the natural branches (Israel) were broken off, and thou standeth by faith, be not high-minded, but fear.

^{Romans 11:25} For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.

^{Romans 11:26} And SO all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob

The commentaries prior to Lacunza’s writings agree that not all of the genetic descendants of Israel were going to be a part of “faithful Israel”. Note how Romans 11:26 uses the word SO, which is an adverb of manner (how) something would be accomplished. Only faithful Israel would be saved by conversion to faith in Christ as Messiah. These authors agreed that salvation has always been done on an individual basis, by the method of repentance and faith in Christ alone. As Galations 28 says: There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

Lacunza’s commentary on verse 26 says the following:

“When the fullness hath entered in, or the time of the nations are concluded, THEN all Israel shall be saved, that is, Israel shall be saved, a little while before the end of the world, after the death of their false messiah”

Notice, Lacunza changes the word “SO” an adverb of manner, to the word “THEN” an adverb of time. He even provides specifics of the time period. From his writings, it is obvious he believed in a singular event in which all ethnic Jews would be converted to faith in Christ. In my lifelong, personal experience of listening to dispensational pastors, there is a tendency to place a great emphasis on “supporting Israel” and by comparison a minor emphasis on actively bringing modern day Jews to faith in Christ.

Again, these are just a couple of examples of Lacunza’s re-interpretations. There are many others.

In 1827, when his book was translated into English, Lacunza succeeded in two ways:

1. He shifted the Reformers focus off of the Pope and Catholicism as being the Antichrist system.

2. He penetrated reformed eschatology with the fully formed basis of dispensationalism. These basics include the notion that Christ returns not once, but twice and at the ‘first stage’ of His return He ‘raptures’ His Church so they escape the reign of the ‘future Antichrist’. Also he made a sharp distinction between Christ’s plan for His church versus an ethnic, national Israel.

While there were scattered hints of dispensational beliefs showing up here and there before Lacunza, no fully formed doctrine like this had ever been taught.

Edward Irving is Enraptured by Lacunza

Edward Irving was a Scottish Protestant minister and theologian whose mind was consumed with futurist biblical prophecy. In 1826, Irving was gaining popularity as a prophetic speaker at the Albury Prophetic Conferences and he founded the Society for the Investigation of Prophecy along with two other ministers. While spending some time in London, he discovered Manuel Lacunza’s book, “The Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty” and fell in love with it, even mastering Spanish so he could translate it himself! At the time, he was duped into believing the author was the “converted Jew” Juan Josafat Ben-Ezra, but by the time he discovered the author was a Catholic Jesuit priest, he no longer cared. Irving translated the book into English and wrote an eloquent preliminary discourse (introduction) for it. It was published by the London Oxford Press in 1827 (see note below). In the introduction, Irving writes that the restoration of Israel is the “restoration of the Jewish nation, to again be the Church of God” and he uses the word “dispensation” 75 times in his introduction alone, proving that Lacunza’s ideas had profoundly impacted him. His popularity grew as he continued to develop his theological ideas around the preeminence of a future Israel and a pre-tribulation rapture, although he did not yet call it that.

Edward Miller described Irving’s eschatological teaching this way: “He began to teach the idea of a two-phase return of Christ, the first phase being a secret rapture prior to the rise of the Antichrist. There are three gatherings: – First, of the first-fruits of the harvest, the wise virgins who follow the Lamb whithersoever He goeth; next, the abundant harvest gathered afterwards by God; and lastly, the assembling of the wicked for punishment.”

In regards to future dispensations granted to Israel, Irving wrote this in the Morning Watch Publication: “My idea is, it is not the Old-Testament (law) but the New-Testament (Grace) dispensation that hath an end: and then the other resumes its course, under Christ and his bride, which is his Church.” Irving made a clear distinction between Israel and the Church as a part of his theology, with Israel’s old-covenant based system making a comeback in the end times.

Irving shared these presentations at the prophetic Albury Conferences and invited his friend Lady Powerscourt to attend. At these meetings, Irving controversially insisted that far from being on the threshold of a new era of blessing, the Church was about to enter a ‘series of thick-coming judgments and fearful perplexities’ preparatory to Christ’s advent and reign. Irving was clearly convinced that the Lord would return in his generation. Lady Powerscourt was so impressed by these conferences that she launched and hosted her own series of meetings called the Powerscourt Prophetic Meetings. Irving often travelled to attend these meetings and would stay in her home when visiting. Lady Powerscourt had another close friend who began attending her meetings, a man by the name of John Nelson Darby. Darby would attend the Powerscourt meetings with Edward Irving, and also attended the previously mentioned Albury conferences where Edward Irving was so popular. This is important to note.

Modern day dispensationalists often deny or downplay the impact of these men knowing each other, in order to provide Darby with full credit for the dispensational rapture eschatology. This is likely due to the fact that Darby himself took full credit for it, and so they want to protect his reputation. Also, Irving’s reputation was later soiled as he would eventually be excommunicated from the church due to an overblown fixation on speaking in tongues and mysticism. Just before his early death at 42 in 1834, his assistant, David Brown, had this to say about him, “Mr. Irving had a rich and surging imagination, never under sufficient control; while the spell of a mysterious future which this study led him to believe was fast approaching, and indeed at the door, laid him open to influences fitted seriously to warp his judgment.”

Keeping Irving’s influence separate from Darby remains so important for dispensationalists, that Liberty University’s own Pre-Tribulation Research Center published a paper on it in 2009 titled “ALLEGED IRVINGITE INFLUENCE ON DARBY AND THE RAPTURE”. The paper denies that Edward Irving ever believed in a pre-tribulation rapture, simply because the interval periods he held between “the saints being caught up” and the “church returning back with Christ in a Cloud of glory” were slightly different than Darby’s.

John Nelson Darby was now primed to set in motion a plan that would forever change Christian end times belief around the world.

If you have enjoyed this article, you will likely enjoy part 2, here:

John Nelson Darby: The Mysterious Father of Dispensationalism

———-

RESEARCH LINKS:

Rome based Architecture firm commissions Manuel Lacunza project in Chile: ARTIFACT Nº1, SCENOGRAPHY FOR "MANUEL LACUNZA"

The Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty by Juan Josafat Ben-Ezra, a Converted Jew (AKA Manuel Lacunza) https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/t27qsqhs95vlpqlnfhxv7/Lacunza_vol1.pdf?rlkey=0n5m5dnzh205rdwwbg08vjgkz&dl=0

A brief overview of Lacunzas Book and it’s effects on theology: https://rumble.com/vtz3n3-genesis-of-dispensational-theology.html

Scotty Yonkers analysis of “The Coming of Messiah” https://scottyonker.com/analysis-coming-messiah-glory-majesty/

What is dispensational premillennialism?: https://www.gotquestions.org/dispensational-premillennialism.html

What is Historic Premillennialism? https://www.compellingtruth.org/historic-premillennialism.html

What is the Rapture: https://billygraham.org/answer/what-is-the-rapture/

Kirk Cameron the Left Behind guy doesn’t believe in the rapture? https://www.forbes.com/sites/jerrybowyer/2017/10/31/has-kirk-cameron-left-behind-left-behind/?sh=b3443a42b871

Origins of Dispensationalism: https://www.understanding-ministries.com/docs/The%20Origins%20of%20Dispensationalism.pdf

Differences in Historic Premil vs Dispensational Premil https://readthehardparts.com/historic-premillennialism/

Wikipedia page for Manuel Lacunza: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Lacunza

Reformers who believed the pope was the antichrist: https://www.semperreformanda.com/creeds/the-reformers-on-who-is-the-antichrist/

Jesuit History of Dispensationalism: https://christianobserver.net/the-history-of-dispensationalism/

Did the Rothschilds buy land in Jerusalem in 1829? https://aminutetomidnite.com/2018/07/20/did-the-rothschilds-really-purchase-jerusalem-in-1829-fact-or-false/

Contemporaries of Edward Irving comment on him: https://charlesasullivan.com/1826/the-irvingites-and-the-gift-of-tongues/#easy-footnote-bottom-9-1826

The Mind of Edward Irving: https://charlesasullivan.com/15321/the-mind-and-world-of-edward-irving/

Liberty University paper denying Edward Irving believed the Pre-Trib Rapture https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1125&context=pretrib_arch

Edward Irving impressed with Margaret Macdonald. https://4windsfellowships.net/articles/rapture_23.pdf

The problematic 70 week Gap in Daniel. https://christianobserver.net/counting-rockets-a-few-thoughts-on-the-war-in-israel/

The Blasphemy of Christian Zionism by James Perloff: https://jamesperloff.net/war-on-christianity-part-2/

Proving dispensationalism did not exist before the 1830’s:

NT Wright on Zionism, is it supported by the Bible?

How does reformed theology view the Future of ethnic Israel:

Jentzen Franklin preaches on End Times, Israel and the Rapture (Pro Dispensational Pre-Tribulation perspective)

Documentary: Dispensation of Heresy

A breakdown of the three biggest Eschatological positions:

The Last Days According to Jesus with R.C. Sproul

Seven Pre-Trib Problems (documentary)

The Jesuit Oath:

Share

In this episode of Incite-FUEL, J.D. Hall and I go straight at the battle over Spurgeon, Scofield, Darby, dispensationalism and Christian Zionism—including claims being made about what Christians supposedly believed long before Scofield ever published his famous reference Bible.

We get into Spurgeon’s own words about the Darbyites and God’s Chosen People under the New Covenant, Cyrus Scofield’s history of deceit and shadiness - AFTER his multiple & conflicting conversion stories, and the enormous influence his reference Bible study notes ultimately had on American Christianity.

But stay through the end.

J.D. and I turn to something much more personal: his past addiction and the repeated allegations that he stole money from his church—allegations connected to criminal charges that were ultimately dropped. Here’s the full account of what happened

History matters. Evidence matters. And repeating an accusation enough times does not make it true.

This is an important episode on more than one level.

Please Share and Subscribe today!

SHOW LINKS:

J.D. Hall on Tucker Carlson

Watch the Hammer Podcast who we answered on this Show

Go deeper on Cyrus Scofield’s life and impact with and article by Jeremy Slayden right here:

Go deeper on Cyrus Scofield’s life and impact with an article series by J.D. Hall right here:

Insight to Incite: Open Source Intelligence Analysis

The Scofield Conspiracy: It's Wild, Bro. Enter at Your Own Risk.

“Riady. That’s all I’m going to tell you. Look at Riady.” Click…

Read more

2 years ago · 108 likes · 4 comments · JD Hall

It’s already got a quarter of 1 million views.

As a guy who has been involved in the men’s masculinity space, I have studied the history of LGBTQ, BLM, critical race theory —and so, I was curious to see the list of Woke Godfathers they would come up with.

In their reel, they actually landed on one man, calling him the “GODFATHER of WOKE.” The gay french intellectual, Michel Foucault.

Was he influential in the 70s? Sure.

Did he do damage to traditional American or Christian education? Yes.

Was he the Godfather of woke? — Hardly.

So I asked myself, “Why did they pick this guy alone”

When watching their full reel it became obvious: They picked Foucault because one of the only safe choices they have as part of institutional conservative MAGA media. You see, Foucault had an interest in revolutionary Iran and political Islam (He even traveled there and met with their leaders). Notice, The final line Nick Freitas states about IRAN in his propaganda reel is that “Foucault was traveling to Iran, cheering on the revolution” —Almost as if he (Foucault) was Muslim himself.

For clarity, here’s the basic overview of his involvement with Iran:

Foucault was fascinated that Iran’s revolution rejected the familiar Marxist model, mobilizing millions around Shiite Islam and Ayatollah Khomeini rather than class struggle. He traveled through Iran, met protesters and religious leaders, and later met Khomeini in exile, praising the movement’s “political spirituality” as a new form of resistance. But after Khomeini took power and the Islamic Republic turned increasingly authoritarian—executing opponents, suppressing dissent, and restricting women—Foucault condemned the abuses and stopped championing the revolution, though critics argue he never fully reckoned with his earlier enthusiasm.

You see, this whole red green alliance is something these dudes are incentivized to promote. When talking about “the origins of woke” they desperately want to remove the spotlight the off of an incredibly obvious yet inconvenient aspect of this entire discussion, and you will see what I mean below. But the 2nd grade version that probably best describes their agenda is : MUSLIM = Left | JEW = Good 😂

So, in order to serve them and you, I decided to brush up on my history and create a fairly comprehensive list of the True “Godfathers of woke” - with a brief description of their contribution, and yes, Foucault still makes the list.

So, let’s trace the intellectual genealogy of woke further back and forward, and we will see if Nick and Seth might have to adjust their premise a bit.

Subscribe

THE GENEALOGY OF WOKE

Read more

Earlier this year, an older friend of mine asked me a question about Mike Huckabee that I gave a pretty good —yet nonspecific answer to. But tonight, I read an article by that answered my friends exact question so perfectly and so spe…

Read more

These are not the beliefs of JSlayUSA or Jeremy Slayden. This is for educational purposes only about modern Jewish beliefs. Please share with those who are unfamiliar.

Wh…

Read more

Peter Boland’s criticism of Joel Webbon over Universal Basic Income (UBI) opened the door to a much bigger conversation with J.D. Hall.

Read more

NOTE: The full, uncut episode is available exclusively to Premium subscribers (my paid supporters) of JSlayUSA on Substack. Full chapter list below.

We begin by examining Peter Boland’s criticism of Joel Webbon and the Christ Is King Conference, and from there, the conversation takes a hard turn into the future.

What happens when artificial intelligence and automation eliminate vast numbers of human jobs? What happens when technological progress accelerates toward what many call the singularity? If human labor becomes increasingly unnecessary, what happens to the Christian’s current political ideals, when the very playing field on which those ideals were created have shifted.

We don’t stop there.

J.D. and JSlay then wade into one of the most controversial interpretive debates in Genesis: Noah’s prophetic curse, the Table of Nations, and the infamous “Curse of Ham.” What does Genesis actually say? How did later interpreters transform the passage into a racial doctrine? And what, if anything, can legitimately be inferred from the biblical text about the nations descended from Noah?

This is a conversation about Christian power, political engagement, artificial intelligence, race, biblical interpretation, and the future of civilization.

It is also a conversation that refuses to treat these subjects as off-limits, even when we disagree with those on our own team.

If you want the entire conversation—including the portions we can’t release publicly—become a Premium subscriber or Patreon member and watch the full episode.

Chapter List

00:00 — Peter Boland, Joel Webbon & the types of Christian Infighting

The Christ Is King Conference controversy, criticism of Webbon, purity spirals, outrage mobs and why Christians so often seek out problems with the people closest to them.

28:35 — Alex Jones, UBI & the Coming Singularity

The Webbon/Alex Jones exchange becomes a much bigger conversation about universal basic income, AI, automation, quantum computing and what happens when technology makes the old economic rules obsolete. 

51:17 — Hitler Comparisons, National Socialism & Christian Politics

The conversation returns to criticism of Webbon and explores political labels, guilt-by-association arguments, Christian political power and what a Christianized society would actually mean.

1:14:46 — Is the Great Commission Really About Evangelism?

This becomes one of the strongest theological portions of the episode: whether Matthew 28 means merely converting individuals or actually discipling nations and teaching them to obey Christ. The argument is developed explicitly around “disciple the nations” beginning around 1:19.

1:37:34 — The Curse of Ham & the Table of Nations

JD lays out his understanding of Genesis 9–10, Ham, Shem, Japheth, Canaan, the Table of Nations and the historical question of whether Noah’s blessings and curse continue through history. 

1:57:01 — Ashkenazi Jews, Japheth & the Question of Origins

The discussion moves specifically into Ashkenaz, European Jewish history, competing claims about Ashkenazi ancestry, migration and how JD connects this back to the Table of Nations.

2:10:57 — Dale Partridge, the Curse of Ham & Where the Line Is

Why is the Curse of Ham controversial? What is Dale Partridge’s position? where JD agrees or disagrees. We close with the broader question of Christianity, Jews and national blessing.

In Episode 3 of Incite-FUEL, J.D. Hall and Jeremy Slayden examine TOKA, an Israeli-founded cyber-intelligence company…

Read more

In Episode 2 of InciteFUEL, Jeremy Slayden and J.D. Hall examine the conflict between the Septuagint and the Masoretic…

Read more

Whenever I refer to “what I was taught” or “what I used to believe” regarding Israel, prophecy, and the end times, I am referring—at a 10,000-foot level—to the timeline below.

One important point before we begin:

During all my formative years of learning this end-times framework, I neve…

Read more

On the premiere episode of Crosscut, Jeff Dornik (host) asks a simple question: Is Israel still God’s chosen people, or did followers of Christ become God’s Chosen?

For more content like this, please check out https://pickax.com

Give Debate Host Jeff Dornik a follow on Substack at: https://substack.com/@jeffdornik?r=qry76&utm_campaign=profile&utm_medium=profile-page

Subscribe now

Dinesh D’Souza and JD Hall debate one of the most loaded questions in Christian theology, moderated by Jeff Dornik. They’ll get into whether Jesus should be understood as a Jew or a Christian, how believers should view modern Israel, and how God wants Christians to think about Jews who reject Jesus. See more content like this on https://pickax.com

Now, watch the full follow-up breakdown of this debate between J.D Hall and myself here:

INSIGHT FUEL is a bold, co-hosted venture between Jeremy Slayden and J.D. Hall, where we take on controversial theological and cultural topics head-on. In this episode, we break down the aftermath of J.D.’s debate with Dinesh D’Souza on whether the church has replaced Israel. Expect unapologetic analysis of Christian Zionism’s origins, the theological c…

Read more

She was given just two to three months to live without treatment, or about 18 months with a medication that would slow the cancer, but greatly reduce the quality of life.

But Emma wasn’t ready to die. She wasn’t ready to stop fighting. And she wasn’t ready to accept that her diagnosis or the treatment scenario offered was her fate.

Her search for hope led her far from home — to Oasis of Hope Hospital in Tijuana, Mexico, a family‑run integrative cancer center known for outcomes that stand out in some of the hardest‑to‑treat cancers. According to the hospital’s published data, Oasis of Hope reports Stage IV breast cancer survival rates of 75%, compared to the 24% national average. For pancreatic cancer, the difference is even more striking: 25% vs. 2%.Instead of accepting this diagnosis and the limited treatment option, Emma traveled from Australia to Oasis of Hope Hospital in Tijuana, Mexico to pursue an integrative approach to cancer care.

Today, approximately 15 months after her diagnosis, Emma says only one very small area of cancer remains.

In this interview, Emma shares:

• Why she declined conventional treatment

• How cancer transformed her faith and outlook on life

• Why she chose Oasis of Hope

• The roles nutrition, immune-based therapies, mindset, and faith have played in her journey

Emma Social Accounts:

Instagram: @emma_victoriaj

Facebook: Emma Victoria Johnson

TikTok: @emmavictoria_j

About Oasis of Hope

Founded in 1963, Oasis of Hope Hospital is an integrative cancer center that combines medical treatment with nutritional, metabolic, immune-based, psychological, and spiritual care.

Learn more at www.oasisofhope.com

About Dr. Francisco Contreras

The interview also highlights the work of Dr. Francisco Contreras, President and Surgical Oncologist at Oasis of Hope. For more than 40 years, he has helped pioneer an integrative approach to cancer care that combines modern oncology with metabolic therapies, immunotherapy, nutrition, and faith-based support. He is also an internationally recognized author and speaker on holistic cancer treatment.

Learn more about Dr. Contreras at www.oasisofhope.com.

Disclaimer: This interview shares one patient’s personal experience and is not intended as professional medical advice.

If you enjoyed this conversation, please like, share, subscribe, and consider supporting my work so I can continue bringing you interviews that challenge, inform, and inspire.

Jeremy’s Substack

The Full Uncensored Interview with Sam Parker.

The Full Uncensored Interview with Sam Parker. Only for Paid Substack Subscribers. Jeremy’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber…

Listen now

2 years ago · 5 likes · Jeremy Slayden

In Part 1, researcher Sam Parker joins me to discuss the latest developments surrounding the Charlie Kirk investigation before diving into Mormon views on Israel, prophecy, and post-70 AD Rabbinic Judaism.

Topics include:

• Highlights and anomalie…

Read more